ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP & INTERPROFESIONAL TEAM DEVELOPMENT

ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP & INTERPROFESIONAL TEAM DEVELOPMENT

Order Description

Label the paper by the attached rubric labels
5 pages
4-5 sources
APA format
check grammar please

ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP & INTERPROFESIONAL TEAM DEVELOPMENT

Competency 7006.01.01: Leadership Concepts and Theories – The graduate evaluates leadership practices that support accountability and integrity within an organization.
Competency 7006.01.02: Systems Theory and Change Theory – The graduate relates systems theory and change theory to the design, delivery, and evaluation of healthcare.
Competency 7006.01.03: Role Development and Effective Interprofessional Teams – The graduate analyzes effective leadership strategies within the context of the

interprofessional team.
Competency 7006.01.04: Business and Economic Principles and Practices – The graduate identifies the impact of business and economic principles and practices, and

regulatory requirements on the provision of healthcare.
Competency 7006.01.05: Contemporary Healthcare Leadership Issues – The graduate analyzes the impact of contemporary healthcare trends and practices on the delivery of

healthcare.
________________________________________
Introduction:

Healthcare is a complicated system that includes unique economic processes, regulatory requirements, and quality indicators that are not found in the traditional

business setting. Therefore, developing unique skill sets relating to organizational leadership and interprofessional team development is essential for leaders within

the healthcare industry at any level. As the complexity within the healthcare industry continues to increase, it is important to understand the comprehensive approach

to patient care management across the continuum and how the concepts of organizational leadership and team development support leaders in creating a patient-centric

environment.

The purpose of this assessment is to provide a framework through which you can experience and understand the unique leadership concepts within healthcare and

understand the implications of business and regulatory requirements on providing patient-centered care. You will use system theory, change theory, self-assessment, and

team development to design a strategy to increase patient-centered care. You will ensure, using leadership concepts and theories, a sustainable model of healthcare

delivery throughout the changing healthcare system based on future trends, evidence-based practice, and regulatory expansion.

For this assessment, you will use the attached “Patient- and Family-Centered Care Organizational Self-Assessment Tool,” to analyze the patient- and family-centeredness

of your current practice setting. This form will guide you in evaluating your current work setting for gaps in patient-centered care attributes. Based on your

analysis, you will create a strategy to bridge those gaps and increase patient-centered care.

Requirements:

Note: Any information that would be considered confidential, proprietary, or personal in nature should not be included. Do not include the actual names of people,

stakeholders, or other personally identifiable information. Fictional names should be used. Also, agency-specific data, including any financial information, should not

be included but should be addressed in a general fashion as appropriate.
A.  Complete the attached “Patient- and Family-Centered Care Organizational Self-Assessment Tool” for your current practice setting.
1.  Describe your current practice setting.
2.  Analyze how patient- and family-centered the evaluated organization is, based on the results from part A.
3.  Discuss gaps where the organization could improve its patient- and family-centeredness, based on the results from part A.

B.  Analyze how business practices and regulatory requirements impact patient- and family-centered healthcare.

C.  Create a strategy that includes goals and an operational plan to increase patient-centeredness in the organization by improving one of the gaps identified in part

A3.
1.  Discuss financial implications that this strategy may have on the organization.
2.  Identify potential members for a multidisciplinary team who could assist you in improving the identified gap.
a.  Discuss the purpose and scope of the team, including team member roles.
b.  Discuss the importance of diversity within the team to support patient-centered care.
c.  Analyze specific tools you could use to facilitate the team in a meaningful way, including self-assessment, awareness, and self-reflection techniques.
3.  Discuss metrics you could use to monitor whether your strategy is effective in increasing patient-centered care.

D.  When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference

list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the

assessment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on

using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.

UOT Task 1
Export to Word link opens in new window

value: 0.00     value: 1.00     value: 2.00     value: 3.00     value: 4.00     Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)    The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.     The candidate provides weak

articulation of response.     The candidate provides limited articulation of response.     The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.     The

candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
A. Self-Assessment Tool    The candidate does not provide a completed “Patient- and Family-Centered Care Organizational Self-Assessment Tool” for the candidate’s current

practice setting.     Not applicable.     Not applicable.     Not applicable.     The candidate provides a completed “Patient- and Family-Centered Care

Organizational Self-Assessment Tool” for the candidate’s current practice setting.
A1. Setting Description    The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the candidate’s current practice setting.     Not applicable.     The candidate

provides an appropriate description, with insufficient detail, of the candidate’s current practice setting.     Not applicable.     The candidate provides an

appropriate description, with sufficient detail, of the candidate’s current practice setting.
A2. Patient- and Family-Centeredness    The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of how patient- and family-centered the evaluated organization is, based on

the results from part A.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with no support, of how patient- and family-centered the evaluated organization is, based

on the results from part A.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with limited support, of how patient- and family-centered the evaluated organization is,

based on the results from part A.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with adequate support, of how patient- and family-centered the evaluated

organization is, based on the results from part A.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with substantial support, of how patient- and family-centered the

evaluated organization is, based on the results from part A.
A3. Areas of Improvement    The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of gaps where the organization could improve its patient- and family-centeredness,

based on the results from part A.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of gaps where the organization could improve its patient- and

family-centeredness, based on the results from part A.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of gaps where the organization could improve

its patient- and family-centeredness, based on the results from part A.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of gaps where the

organization could improve its patient- and family-centeredness, based on the results from part A.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial

detail, of gaps where the organization could improve its patient- and family-centeredness, based on the results from part A.
B. Business Practices    The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of how business practices and regulatory requirements impact patient- and family-centered

healthcare.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with no support, of how business practices and regulatory requirements impact patient- and family-centered

healthcare.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with limited support, of how business practices and regulatory requirements impact patient- and family-

centered healthcare.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with adequate detail, of how business practices and regulatory requirements impact patient- and

family-centered healthcare.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with substantial support, of how business practices and regulatory requirements impact

patient- and family-centered healthcare.
C. Strategy    The candidate does not create a strategy to increase patient-centeredness in the organization by improving 1 of the gaps identified in part A3.

The candidate creates a logical strategy, with no detail, to increase patient-centeredness in the organization by improving 1 of the gaps identified in part A3.

The candidate creates a logical strategy, with limited detail, to increase patient-centeredness in the organization by improving 1 of the gaps identified in part A3.

The candidate creates a logical strategy, with adequate detail, to increase patient-centeredness in the organization by improving 1 of the gaps identified in part A3.

The candidate creates a logical strategy, with substantial detail, to increase patient-centeredness in the organization by improving 1 of the gaps identified in part

A3.
C1. Financial Implications    The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the financial implications that this strategy may have on the organization.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the financial implications that this strategy may have on the organization.     The candidate provides

a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the financial implications that this strategy may have on the organization.     The candidate provides a logical

discussion, with adequate detail, of the financial implications that this strategy may have on the organization.     The candidate provides a logical discussion,

with substantial detail, of the financial implications that this strategy may have on the organization.
C2. Multidisciplinary Team Members    The candidate does not identify appropriate potential members for a multidisciplinary team who could assist the candidate in

improving the identified gap.     Not applicable.     Not applicable.     Not applicable.     The candidate identifies appropriate potential members for a

multidisciplinary team who could assist the candidate in improving the identified gap.
C2a. Purpose and Scope of Team    The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the purpose and scope of the team, including team member roles.     The candidate

provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the purpose and scope of the team, including team member roles.     The candidate provides a logical discussion,

with limited detail, of the purpose and scope of the team, including team member roles.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of

the purpose and scope of the team, including team member roles.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the purpose and scope

of the team, including team member roles.
C2b. Team Diversity    The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the importance of diversity within the team to support patient-centered care.     The

candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of the importance of diversity within the team to support patient-centered care.     The candidate provides

a logical discussion, with limited support, of the importance of diversity within the team to support patient-centered care.     The candidate provides a logical

discussion, with adequate support, of the importance of diversity within the team to support patient-centered care.     The candidate provides a logical discussion,

with substantial support, of the importance of diversity within the team to support patient-centered care.
C2c. Tools for the Team    The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of the specific tools to use to facilitate the team in a meaningful way, including self-

assessment, awareness, and self-reflection techniques.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with no detail, of the specific tools to use to facilitate the

team in a meaningful way, including self-assessment, awareness, and self-reflection techniques.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with limited

detail, of the specific tools to use to facilitate the team in a meaningful way, including self-assessment, awareness, and self-reflection techniques.     The candidate

provides a plausible analysis, with adequate detail, of the specific tools to use to facilitate the team in a meaningful way, including self-assessment, awareness, and

self-reflection techniques.     The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with substantial detail, of the specific tools to use to facilitate the team in a

meaningful way, including self-assessment, awareness, and self-reflection techniques.
C3. Metrics    The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the metrics to use to monitor whether the strategy is effective in increasing patient-centered

care.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the metrics to use to monitor whether the strategy is effective in increasing patient-centered

care.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the metrics to use to monitor whether the strategy is effective in increasing patient-

centered care.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the metrics to use to monitor whether the strategy is effective in increasing

patient-centered care.     The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the metrics to use to monitor whether the strategy is effective in

increasing patient-centered care.
D. Sources    When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references.     When the candidate uses sources, the candidate

provides only some in-text citations and references.     When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major

deviations from APA style.     When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA

style.     When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR

the candidate does not use sources.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Do You Need A Similar Assignment?

Place an order with us. Our skilled and experienced writers will deliver a custom paper which is not plagiarized within the deadline which you will specify.

Note; 6 Hours urgent orders deliver also available.

If you need more clarifications contact our support staff via the live chat for immediate response.

 

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: